Awaiting reviewer assignment meaning. So I just wonder why it was returned to the AE again.
Awaiting reviewer assignment meaning.
AE stands for Associate Editor.
Awaiting reviewer assignment meaning 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. ' However, I'm Normally whenever this status shows it usually means that decision arrives in 3-5 days. This is usually because of a scope mismatch, or in some cases, the novelty and/or quality of Awaiting Reviewer Scores. That way, less reviewer time is wasted, and it would have a general downward effect on the number I submitted a manuscript and the status changed from Awaiting AE assignment to Awaiting Referee Selection and then Awaiting Referee Assignment. This may, however, vary across journals. The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). Commented Mar 26, AE means it is awaiting associate editor Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed, then it is possible that the online status tracking software uses the status "awaiting reviewer selection" to indicate that the paper is with the editor. The invitations have been sent (probably in multiple rounds), but the reviewers have not yet agreed to review the Here's what each status likely means: Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. 15 answers My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. Eic usually signifies the Editor in chief. Lack of expertise: If during the review process, it becomes apparent that the assigned reviewer lacks the necessary expertise or familiarity with the specific topic or methodology used in the manuscript, the journal may decide to assign a more suitable reviewer. awaiting AE decision, then Awaiting Awaiting Referee Reports meaning. But only after two days under review the status changed to “ Maybe the reviews were quick or a reviewer declined the review. If that was the case for your paper, then a subsequent change to "Awaiting reviewer invitation" would mean that the editor is sending your paper for an additional review. Now, the status is 'Awaiting EiC Decision. "awaiting other reviewer" not only signifies a stage in the review process where one reviewer has completed their assessment or screening of a What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. How do you submit a rating? When you open a review in the AE queue there will see a question at the end marked "Quality Assessment. They could have two, and a bunch of unanswered invites. This change has occurred Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. During this time, the editor looks for suitable reviewers for your paper and sends out After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The minimum would be either two or three depending on the Initially your manuscript will go through stages such as “Awaiting Admin Checklist” and/or “Awaiting Editor Assignment” depending on how new submissions are initially checked The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" means that your paper has cleared teh initial editorial screening and will be sent for peer review. Awaiting Se Assignment Meaning. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The status “'Awaiting AE evaluation'” means that that the peer review has been completed and now the Assigned Editor (AE) will consider the feedback provided by the peer reviewers and arrives at a decision. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so This means that your manuscript has not yet been assigned to a reviewer. Oct 2022, it passed all the steps of reviews. Meaning of change from Awaiting AE Recommendation back to Awaiting Reviewer Scores It could be that not all the reviewer’s final comments have come in. " Initially, once your paper was submitted, the Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. What does this mean? Please help. A copy of the reviewer list will be available. This status indicates that a Managing Editor is being assigned based on that Meaning of ‘Awaiting Editor Assignment’ This means that your manuscript has cleared the admin check, that is, it was found matching the journal’s scope and also adhering to the journal’s guidelines, apart from a cursory check of the novelty and quality of the study. It shows all status changes throughout the life of the manuscript, from the initiation of the submission process through quality control, reviewer assignment, and decision. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. She informed me that one reviewer had returned their review and the other review was pending with a The acronym ME most likely stands for "Managing Editor" or "Manuscript Editor", and so the message says that the paper is awaiting processing by this person. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. More than two years in a journal. ” Should I inquire about the review status? The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. Reviewers are normally asked to submit their comments within 60 (calendar) days in which to carry out a first review. Awaiting EIC decision must have appeared after the first status while you did not check your status! It Appearing after short interval of awaiting reviewer assignment clearly means that associate editors have advised against it! Now the EIC has to make decision. Thank you for your question. the other one move from AE assignment to reviewer selection pretty fast, like in 5 days. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". Commented Nov 21, 2016 at 12:27. After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. Then after a week or so, it changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Score(s)" and same day it changed back to "Under Review". The status of the paper was 'Submitted. In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". "Awaiting reviewer assignment" means that the AE has sent your manuscript to a certain number of reviewers, waiting for their agreement to review. There is no set time for this to take. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. It means that the AE has performed their initial check (as described in the previous point) and is looking for suitable peer reviewers. If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. This means that potential reviewers have been selected, but have yet to be invited. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. I submitted a paper on April 8. As stated by Rodriguez, Bollen, and Van de Sompel (2007): “one of the first and potentially most important stage is the one that attempts to distribute submitted 0. Relatedly, does under review mean that the AE has sent to referees or just that AE has been assigned? As I recall, it switches to showing Awaiting reviewer scores, the. Due to those unanswered invites, the status says 'awaiting assignment. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. The journal says on average they take 30 days to make a decision on a paper. While this is, Going by that assumption, the status of your first manuscript "ED: Not Assigned, GE: Not Assigned, Awaiting JM Checklist" means that no action has yet been taken on your paper. Last December, I submitted my paper to a Springer Nature journal. Does this mean the article is rejected? Asked by S Gh on 02 Dec, 2021 Generally, the status changes to "Awaiting ED recommendations" once peer review for the paper is done and the reviewer comments have come in. However, there has been no status change for more than two-and-a-half months. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. Awaiting reviewer scores --> self-explanatory Reviews completed --> self-explanatory With editor --> this may occur early in the review process, indicating the article is under desk review by relevant editor(s), who are deciding whether to send the paper to reviewers; but it may also occur after reviewer scores are received, indicating the "Awaiting ED Decision" would suggest that a decision is pending on your manuscript, which may not be a rejection - but in fact could be a suggestion to revise and resubmit, or even an acceptance. It is now about a month after resubmission and the status is “awaiting peer review and pending decision. From your query, it seems reviewers have been assigned for your manuscript. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. Under Review: This means Four days later, however, a new line appeared, “Waiting for Reviewer Assignment. A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. Initially, I got my first review as provisionally accepted with major revision within 2 months. Otherwise, please I submitted my paper in January. My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to I have experienced a confusing situation. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. , "Awaiting AE decision". The ‘Accept’ perhaps means that it is awaiting the peer reviewers’ acceptance – that is, their readiness to review the manuscript. 2, the assignment result of reviewers to papers determines the expertise of the reviewer who will review the paper, hence it is the crucial step in the whole peer review process. It’s only when the status changes to ‘Under Review,’ as you have rightly understood, that the actual review begins. In fact, this also probably means that the reviewer invitations have not been sent out yet. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. Decide not enough of having an additional review the assigned editor would you? Manuscript is accepted the manuscript may a decision can a potential conflict of a new reviewer assignment stage. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ typically means that the Associate Editor (AE) has had a look at the paper and decided not to send it for review. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. This change has occurred AE stands for Associate Editor. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. And now statues is "awaiting ed final processing". What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. Then, there was a call for reviewers, and the status changed to ‘Reviewers Invited. I could not guess what this possibly means. Awaiting Reviewer Selection While the Editor is assigned to a manuscript, authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. This change has occurred Generally speaking, the status "Awaiting a reviewer reply" could mean either of two things: 1. Dec 12, 2019 · I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Review Settings . After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. After a couple of days, the status changed from "Awaiting AE assignment" to "Under Review". For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. (I thought you had already tried email, sorry. Commented Jun 26 After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This means that when a user role is updated, the e-mail templates will automatically be updated. – StrongBad. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in It means the Editor wants to assign your manuscript to a reviewer. This change has occurred The status "Reviewer assignment pending" clearly indicates that your paper has not yet been sent for peer review. The ME, or perhaps the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), will make the final decision based on I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. Sometimes, a reviewer may pull out after being assigned, for reasons of a lack of time, mismatch (with their subject area), or conflict of interest. The second update, Awaiting Referee Selection, means that the manuscript has completed the internal check and is now awaiting peer review. A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. The status kept on changing between ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and ‘Awaiting Reviewer Scores’ for three months, at which point I contacted the editor and requested a projected timeline for the evaluation process. Hello, for your information, I submitted my paper on the 28. well I'm not sure. The status of the paper changed several times. the status "Awaiting Referee Report" implies that the reviewers are already assigned and review work is in-progress. View comments as feedback I submitted a short paper to a math journal more that one month ago. ’ It's been one month since this change happened and there is no update. 5. – Parnian. Can you please explain what it is going on? Awaiting Screener Assignment: This typically means that the editor has not been able to find the requisite number of reviewers and is still looking. – Vicky. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Once the journal sends reviewer invitations and the reviewers accept them, peer review will start and the status will change to "Under review. A reviewer may recommend that the editor immediately accepts or rejects a submission, or they may request revisions. Papers that do not meet these criteria will be rejected. Where do you find a reviewer’s R-Score? The R-Score can be found in the Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: تعدادی از داورها انجام داوری را پذیرفته اند اما هنوز به تعداد کافی نرسیده است Awaiting Reviewer Scores: تعداد کافی پذیرفتند مقاله شما را داوری کنند و ادیتورها منتظر نظرات آنها هستند You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. But after three days of this change, suddenly, the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment. You will find out when you find out. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. ’) So, great, that’s one step After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I didnt see the "under review It means nothing. It passed the initial evaluation 10 days later. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. Some reviewers will ask for a longer period of time; if the request is reasonable, please grant it. My last status was ''awaiting AE recommendation," and now it has changed to ''awaiting ED decision'' does this means my paper is rejected or what? Right after the submission, the status changed to "Awaiting AE assignment" but it remains for about three months. ' On May 21, our paper's status changed to 'Editorial assignment pending. Probably means it will be desk rejected if it did not go out to reviewers. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. But in the journal i submitted to, under review means AE is examining the paper as the first stage, while "awaiting reviewer scores" means it's actually out for review. e. Manuscript status changing from Awaiting Reviewer Invitation to Awaiting Reviewer Assignment ? Question. Perhaps one or more are pending. 15. Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. If the The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. Manuscripts quite often return to this stage if not enough of the invited reviewers accepted the invitation so further invitations need to be sent. " Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer Meaning of the Under Review status in the ScholarOne system Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. Anyway, they seem to Answer: Dear author, The editorial hierarchy varies from journal to journal. I have submitted my paper to an IET journal. How to handle situation in which the article has been "Awaiting reviewer assignment" for 5 months? Hot Network Questions I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which Reviewer List. 3. This change has occurred One of the slightly confusing things that GEMS does to authors is show them the Manuscript Status Table at the bottom of the page regarding a submission. Once initial check up is done on your manuscript, the EIC will screen your manuscript to check if it fits the scope of the journal and if it is of sufficient interest to the journal's readership. One possibility is that since there was a delay in the review, the paper was sent to a different reviewer without waiting too long for the overdue review. Commented Nov 21, 2016 at 8:43. Now the handling One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days now. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for the journal. After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". This status typically means your manuscript is awaiting assignment to an editor after the initial review of the submission. Editorial decisions I submitted my manuscript to Management Science. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. If they do, they would be assigned at this stage. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? Thank you for your question. 9. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will The Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores status also means that the AE has assigned the basic number of peer reviewers required for the manuscript, either two or three. ” This means that one of the two original reviewers declined to review this revised version of the manuscript, and so the editor had a choice: continue without this reviewer or find a replacement. This change has occurred So, this would mean that from "Admin: Not Assigned," the status changed to "EA: [name],"first, and then to "Awaiting ED assignment" and finally to "Awaiting CE decision. Awaiting Reviewer Selection After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Hi. the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment A specific threshold T can be defined to identify the qualifications of reviewers. It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. Is this normal?I received an acceptance pending minor revisions. · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has accepted the invitation and/or at least one evaluation has I submitted my paper on June 24 and after few comments from the admin on the paper files I resubmitted the paper. ' I have heard from seniors that the EiC is only consulted for making acceptance-related decisions and that the AE gives [makes] other Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable Editor here. After the ADM had been assigned, I remember seeing "reviewer assignment" and "reviewer After 18 days the status was "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment". (‘Referee’ is another term for ‘peer reviewer. However, I definitely remember the last two: Feb 26, 2021 · Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. The following query and answer may be of further help to you: What does awaiting ED decision after awaiting BM assessment mean ? | Editage Insights Peer review process. 2. Depending on the journal's workflow, this status could also indicate when the editorial office determines if your submission is eligible for peer review. ' If the two reviews come in, and are concordant, the editor can decide to make the decision with the two reviews in hand. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where In such cases, the journal will assign a different reviewer. These status should not be taken seriously. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. After making the necessary changes, I submitted the manuscript. Due to the situation necessitated by COVID-19, journal workflows and decision-making may have been impacted to some extent. I submitted a paper to a journal. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to The status of my submission is still "awaiting assignment". Last month, I sent an e-mail to the administrator, and I received response which said "Senior editor will respond to your query". You may want to request an update to expedite the rejection. A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon In Covidence, the status "awaiting other reviewer" means that a reference has been voted on by one reviewer, but a second vote is required before the reference can be moved to the next stage in the review process. This change has occurred After almost three weeks of "Awaiting reviewer assignment" status, it changes to "Reviewers contacted". It looks like the editor wanted another opinion about the paper Stage 2: Editor assigned Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. ’ However, 14 days later, it changed to ‘Reviewers Invited. But if it is, it probably means the following. Generally, 2-3 peer reviewers are assigned to a paper. May I ask if this is normal? How long have I to wait before formally asking the editor about the status of my submission? My field is mathematics. After one week with the editor, the Becoming a Peer Reviewer; Career Advice for researchers; Mental Health. This change has occurred 'Awaiting decision' means the required reviews to make a decision were completed. Now the status is I submitted a manuscript 4. And after 4 months the status changed to "awaiting EIC decision". This April, we received the reviewer's response and resubmitted after correction on May 18. ' Is it under review again or has the editor not seen my paper? Could you please clarify? Meaning of quick change from Awaiting Reviewer Selection to Awaiting Decision While this typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review, because the status changed so quickly after submission, this So, you could check the exact status. After half a day, the status changed to ‘Under Review. 2fx Awaiting COI Awaiting all author Conflict of Interest forms to be supplied 2g Report sent to Editor-in-Chief Peer reviewer comments are sent to the Editor-in-Chief of the journal. This will include reviewers who were selected, invited, assigned, invitation response records, and copies of the reviewer score sheets received. – PsySp. Commented Mar 14, 2022 at 2:51. Asked 4th Aug, 2021; Today, I noticed that the status was then changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment". About two months after my article was submitted, its status changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting PE decision". The status is still "awaiting assignment" and I checked the online system which shows that even no editor has been assigned to my paper. What is the precise meaning of 'best tariff' in the German Telekommunikationsgesetz (TKG)? In Awaiting reviewers simply means that they do not have 3 people who have agreed to review the MS. This change has occurred The editors are reading it and checking their reviewer list. Here's what each status likely means: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. 00 means that no reviews have been rated. Required Reviews - #: when this number of reviews are complete, the status changes to 'Required Reviews Complete' Uninvite After - # . If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience So, we have made some edits/assumptions. EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. This means the initial check on the manuscript is complete, which means that the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) and/or the Associate Editor (AE) believe/s the manuscript fulfills basic journal criteria such as novelty of the research, quality of the writing, After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Mental Health in Academia. Generally, the number of reviewers who agree to review is greater than or equal to 3 (in a few cases, 2 is also acceptable), and the status will change to "awaiting reviewer scores". ‘Awaiting Reviewer’ means that the manuscript has been sent to the peer reviewers. 5 months ago. Today it went back to "awaiting "Awaiting EIC decision" means that the journal is waiting on a decision by the "Editor in Chief". So, even after one reviewer submits his report, the immediate change in status would be a reflection of that action, i. When the system shows the status “Reviewer invited,” it Answer: The status ‘Awaiting Referee Selection’ typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review. The AE may have thought that all had come in, but may have later seen that that’s not the case, and so, may have modified the status. So I just wonder why it was returned to the AE again – notfunnyatall. " This is where you can rate the review, and it will become part of the reviewer's score. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. My manuscript submission status in ManuscriptCentral changed from ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment’ to ‘Under Review’ after 15 days of submission. Assigned editor had perhaps sent the names and share your comment on signal processing, and that reviewers. 15 answers. ’ Does anyone know what Awaiting AE Assignment after one month of Awaiting Reviewer Scores means in ScholarOne? I find this very weird. (3) At most, each reviewer should be assigned to a defined number of manuscripts, b j, chosen by the team responsible for assigning reviewers. The entire peer review process usually takes between 2 and 6 months. Do not email to ask about What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. What can this mean? The platform is This means that the manuscript has been sent for peer review and the peer review has likely been completed, and now the journal is awaiting the final scores from the reviewer/s. The assigned reviewer will review the manuscript and provide recommendations that would help the editor reach a If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and It means that the reviewers have not been assigned yet. What does this mean? The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). ) – aparente001. The status "Awaiting Referee Report" implies that the reviewers are already assigned and review work is in-progress. A week later, the status changed to Awaiting Editor Assignment. I'm not sure what JM checklist refers to, but my guess is that it refers to a journal requirement that you might not have met. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. I sent two emails about updating the status of the paper to editor and Editor-in-Chief several days ago and I got no reply from them. ’ But this could be because the associate editor (AE) may have had a challenge finding reviewers for your manuscript. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. The editor in chief may not just 'accept' or 'reject' the manuscript. Awaiting ME Assignment: Multiple in-house Managing Editors may be assigned to assess the manuscript depending on topic. The reviewer has accepted the invitation and the editor is waiting to receive reviewer comments. So, the manuscript is out to all two or three reviewers, who will get back with their decision. A polite email inquiry can't do any harm. We have developed some helpful tips to guide you through the revision process. I was asked to resubmit the paper with modifications within a month. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". If major problems are found at this stage, the reviewer may feel comfortable rejecting the paper without further work. Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months after submission. 2f New reviewer(s) required If insufficient reviewer comments are received or if the comments are inconclusive additional peer reviewers will be identified. As you've mentioned, you have addressed the previous reviewer's concerns, so the EIC may suggest moving the manuscript to peer-review based on what you have addressed. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. What does this mean? Will it go for review? The first process ( Awaiting Reviewer Invitation ) means looking for suitable reviewers to invitate While the second process ( Awaiting Reviewer Assignmet) means suitable reviewers has been found The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. Note that an Edit link appears here only if you have permission to adjust the settings. After that, it changed to Awaiting Referee Selection once again. Invitation to Reviewers. " The statuses I've seen are: Awaiting Reviewer Selection, Awaiting Third Opinion, Awaiting Screener Assignment, and Awaiting Second Opinion. This paper really means a lot to me. How to handle situation in which the article has been "Awaiting reviewer assignment" for 5 months? 3. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again As can be inferred from Fig. -Awaiting AE Assignment Dear Bilal Ahmad The status 'Awaiting AE Recommendation' means the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Peer review is the process used to assess whether an academic paper is suitable for publication based on the quality, originality and importance of the work. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to complete the assignment. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. Just give it some time; either you will get a decision or it will go for the review process. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Awaiting Admin Processing: Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. Commented Mar 8, 2017 at 12:19 @PsySp There is a section "Editorial decision" in the answer of the linked Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – there is no separate system status to indicate this). As shown in this question on the process for journals , that initial Awaiting AE assignment to Under Review? Related. On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does it mean rejection? Awaiting Editor Assignment: While this typically means that the manuscript is awaiting assignment to an AE, in this case, it probably means it is awaiting assignment to a peer reviewer. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. ’ So far, so good. Editor assigned I have two questions. This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. pzxlvdbnsxpxhikvbrsizsetqzzhhmillaoidgsbdfuk